Menu
Peptide Database
Results
No peptides found
Featured

Use search to browse all 100+ peptides

Thymosin-alpha-1

Thymalfasin, Zadaxin, Thymosin α1

Quick Stats
Studies 759
Trials 63
Score 2
2020 pubmed 24 citations

The effect of thymosin α1 on mortality of critical COVID-19 patients: A multicenter retrospective study.

Sun. Qin Q; Xie. Jianfeng J; Zheng. Ruiqiang R; Li. Xuyan X; Chen. Hui H; Tong. Zhaohui Z; Du. Bin B; Qiu. Haibo H; Yang. Yi Y

Key Findings

  • Overall 28‑day mortality was similar between thymosin‑alpha‑1 users and non‑users after propensity score matching (51.0% vs 52.9%).
  • A modest reduction in mortality was observed only in male patients (hazard ratio 0.673, p = 0.049).
  • Cluster analysis identified two patient phenotypes, but thymosin‑alpha‑1 did not improve survival in either group.

Practical Outcomes

  • For biohackers and self‑experimenters, this study suggests thymosin‑alpha‑1 is not a reliable way to boost survival in severe COVID‑19 cases. The only possible signal in men is weak and needs more rigorous testing, so routine use for this purpose is not recommended. Focus on interventions with clearer evidence of benefit.

Summary

In a large retrospective study of critically ill COVID‑19 patients, giving thymosin‑alpha‑1 did not lower the chance of dying within 28 days. After matching patients to balance other factors, mortality was almost the same whether they got the peptide or not. A tiny hint of benefit showed up only in men, but the effect was weak and not seen in any other groups.

Abstract

Thymosin α1 therapy was commonly used in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), while its impact on outcomes and which patients could benefit from thymosin α1 therapy were uncertain. Patients with COVID-19 from 19 designated hospitals between January 1 to February 29, 2020 were included, and the main exposure of interest was administration of thymosin α1. The primary outcome was 28-day mortality. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to account for baseline confounders, cluster analysis and Cox proportional hazard model was used to account for subgroup analysis. A total of 771 patients were included, and 327/771 (42.4%) patients received thymosin α1 therapy. The 28-day mortality in thymosin group was significantly lower than that in control group (41.3% vs. 60.6%, p < 0.001). After PSM 522 patients were included in analysis and the 28-day mortality in thymosin α1 group and control group were 51.0% and 52.9% respectively, with no significant difference. In subgroup analyses, the association between thymosin α1 therapy and 28-day mortality appeared to be stronger among male patients (HR 0.673, 95% CI 0.454-0.998; p = 0.049). There were no benefits of thymosin α1 in 28-day mortality in other subgroups. There were two phenotypes after cluster analysis, but no benefits of thymosin α1 were shown in phenotype 1 (HR 0.823 95% CI 0.581-1.166; p = 0.273) and phenotype 2 (HR 1.148 95% CI 0.710-1.895; p = 0.442). There was no association between use of thymosin α1 and decreased mortality in critically ill COVID-19 patients. Subgroups analysis and phenotype analysis also showed no differences on mortality after thymosin α1 therapy.

Study Information

Provider

pubmed

Year

2020

Date

2020-10-31T00:00:00.000Z

DOI

10.1016/j.intimp.2020.107143

Citations

24

References

28