Menu
Peptide Database
Results
No peptides found
Featured

Use search to browse all 100+ peptides

Thymosin-alpha-1

Thymalfasin, Zadaxin, Thymosin α1

Quick Stats
Studies 759
Trials 63
Score 2
2010 pubmed 12 citations

Thymosin alpha 1 for treatment of hepatitis C virus: promise and proof.

Sherman. Kenneth E KE

Key Findings

  • Thymosin alpha‑1 has immunomodulatory properties that could aid hepatitis C therapy
  • Early research suggested possible benefits in hard‑to‑treat HCV patients
  • Large randomized trials have not provided conclusive proof of effectiveness

Practical Outcomes

  • At this time there’s no solid evidence to add thymosin alpha‑1 to standard hepatitis C regimens, and no dosing guidance is available. It’s best to stick with proven antiviral therapies unless you’re enrolling in a clinical trial.

Summary

Thymosin alpha‑1 is a peptide that can boost the immune system and has been tested as an add‑on to standard hepatitis C drugs. Some early studies hinted it might help people who don’t respond well to the usual treatment, but larger, well‑designed trials haven’t confirmed a clear benefit yet.

Abstract

The hepatitis C virus (HCV) is a global public health problem, with chronic infection leading to development of cirrhosis, end-stage liver disease and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Treatment of HCV is suboptimal with overall response rates of slightly greater than 50% when patients are treated with pegylated interferon alfa and ribavirin. Thymosin alpha 1 (Talpha1; TA-1) is an immunomodulatory peptide with intrinsic activities that might improve treatment outcomes for HCV by incorporation of this agent in current treatment paradigms. An extensive body of literature supports a possible role for this agent in difficult to treat populations. However, clinical trials to date have failed to conclusively support the role of TA-1 in combination interferon-based therapies. Therefore, the promise of TA-1 adjunctive therapy for HCV remains, but the proof will require investment in large randomized clinical trials of appropriate patient populations.

Study Information

Provider

pubmed

Year

2010

Date

2010-05-01T00:00:00.000Z

DOI

10.1111/j.1749-6632.2010.05460.x

Citations

12

References

28