Comparison of the efficacy of thymosin alpha-1 and interferon alpha in the treatment of chronic hepatitis B: a meta-analysis.
Yang. Yong-Feng YF; Zhao. Wei W; Zhong. Yan-Dan YD; Yang. Yi-Jun YJ; Shen. Ling L; Zhang. Ning N; Huang. Ping P
Key Findings
- At the end of a 6‑month course, thymosin‑alpha‑1 showed no significant advantage over interferon‑alpha for viral or liver‑enzyme outcomes (ORs ~0.6).
- Six months after treatment, thymosin‑alpha‑1 produced significantly better virological, biochemical and overall response rates (ORs 2.7‑3.7).
- The majority of the data come from HBeAg‑negative chronic hepatitis B patients, limiting broader applicability.
Practical Outcomes
- If you have chronic hepatitis B, thymosin‑alpha‑1 may be a viable alternative to interferon‑alpha, but expect benefits to appear after treatment ends. Use a follow‑up period of at least six months to assess its effectiveness, and note it may be most relevant for HBeAg‑negative cases.
Summary
A meta‑analysis of four small trials shows that thymosin‑alpha‑1 isn’t noticeably better than interferon‑alpha while you’re taking it, but six months after stopping treatment it leads to higher rates of viral suppression and liver‑enzyme normalization in chronic hepatitis B patients, especially those who are HBeAg‑negative.
Abstract
Chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection is a serious problem because of its worldwide distribution and possible adverse sequelae, such as cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma. Thymosin alpha-1 (Talpha1) is an immune modifier that has been shown to be effective for chronic hepatitis B (CHB) in some trials. But the trials comparing Talpha1 vs. interferon alpha (IFNalpha) treatment in CHB have been small and the results have been inconsistent. So we conducted a meta-analysis to compare the efficacy of Talpha1 and IFNalpha in the treatment of CHB. Generally, four randomized controlled trials including 199 CHB patients who received Talpha1 or IFNalpha treatment were identified through MEDLINE and EMBASE online search. Virological (for hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg) positive patients, loss of HBV DNA and HBeAg; for HBeAg negative patients, loss of HBV DNA), biochemical (normalization of transaminases) and complete responses (fulfill criteria of biochemical and virological response simultaneously) were analyzed using the intention-to-treat method. The odds ratio (OR) was used to measure the magnitude of the efficacy. The ORs (95% confidence interval) of the virological response, biochemical response and complete response of Talpha1 over IFNalpha at the end of 6 months treatment were 0.62 (0.35, 1.10), 0.60 (0.34, 1.05) and 0.54 (0.30, 0.97), respectively. The ORs (95% confidence interval) of the virological response, biochemical response and complete response of Talpha1 over IFNalpha at the end of follow-up (6 months post-treatment) were 3.71 (2.05, 6.71), 3.12 (1.74, 5.62) and 2.69 (1.47, 4.91), respectively. These data showed that compared with IFNalpha, the benefit of Talpha1 was not immediately significant at the end of therapy, but virological, biochemical and complete response had a tendency to increase or accumulate gradually after the therapy. For three of the four trials that studied HBeAg-negative patients, the results are mostly applicable to HBeAg-negative CHB.
Study Information
pubmed
2007
2007-11-26T00:00:00.000Z
10.1016/j.antiviral.2007.10.014