From one-size-fits-all to phenotype-based pharmacotherapy: How far are we in obesity management?
Koufakis. Theocharis T; Busetto. Luca L
Key Findings
- Tirzepatide produces weight reductions comparable to bariatric surgery in some groups.
- Dual incretin therapy may be especially useful for the “slow burn” phenotype (metabolic inefficiency).
- Phenotype‑guided treatment could improve outcomes, but current phenotype definitions lack strong validation.
Practical Outcomes
- If you’re experimenting with tirzepatide, consider which obesity phenotype fits you—e.g., if you struggle with constant hunger despite eating, a GLP‑1 agonist may help; if your main issue is a sluggish metabolism, tirzepatide’s dual action might be optimal. Use this framework to tailor dosing and combine with lifestyle tweaks for better, more sustainable results.
Summary
The paper says tirzepatide, a dual GLP‑1/GIP drug, can cause big weight loss—sometimes as much as surgery—while also improving blood sugar and heart health. It proposes that obesity comes in four “phenotypes” (hungry brain, hungry gut, emotional hunger, slow burn) and that matching the right drug to the right phenotype could make treatment even more effective.
Abstract
Obesity is a global health crisis, projected to affect over one billion adults by 2030. Lifestyle modification strategies-diet, physical activity, and behavioral therapy-have achieved only modest and often unsustainable outcomes. Pharmacotherapy has therefore emerged as a cornerstone of modern obesity care. Glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists and dual incretin agents such as tirzepatide have demonstrated unprecedented efficacy, with weight reductions approaching surgical outcomes in some populations while improving glycemic and cardiometabolic parameters. These therapeutic advances align with recognition of the pathophysiological heterogeneity of obesity, often conceptualized through four phenotypes: "hungry brain" (impaired satiation), "hungry gut" (impaired satiety), "emotional hunger" (reward-driven eating), and "slow burn" (impaired metabolism). This framework offers a rationale for targeted interventions-GLP-1 receptor agonists for satiety-related phenotypes, naltrexone-bupropion for reward-driven eating, and dual incretin therapies for metabolic inefficiency. Beyond pharmacology, accumulating evidence indicates that surgical outcomes may also differ across patient subgroups, suggesting that phenotype-guided strategies could refine not only medical therapy but also surgical decision-making. However, these phenotypes remain heuristic, with overlapping traits, limited validation, and uncertain predictive value. Future research should refine phenotypic classification, identify reliable biomarkers, and conduct phenotype-stratified clinical trials to confirm matching of pharmacological and surgical interventions.
Study Information
pubmed
2025
2025-11-19T00:00:00.000Z
10.1016/j.coph.2025.102589
38