Menu
Peptide Database
Results
No peptides found
Featured

Use search to browse all 100+ peptides

Tirzepatide

Mounjaro, Zepbound, LY3298176

Quick Stats
Studies 183
Trials 100
Score 3
2025 pubmed

A metabolic comparison of GIPR agonism versus GIPR antagonism in male mice.

Davies. Iona I; Turland. Alexandra A; Tran. Hanh Duyen HD; Wong. Carissa C; Cahn. Olivier O; Dunsterville. Cecilia C; Sun. Yichang Y; Xiao. Yilin Y; Murphy. Kevin G KG; Bloom. Stephen R SR; Jones. Ben B; Tan. Tricia M M TMM

Key Findings

  • GIPR agonist improved glucose tolerance without affecting weight in lean mice
  • Both GIPR agonist and antagonist reduced food intake and body weight in obese mice
  • GIPR antagonist caused a drop in insulin sensitivity compared to controls
  • Both treatments slightly increased liver triglycerides but did not affect bone markers

Practical Outcomes

  • For biohackers, the data suggest that drugs that activate GIPR (like tirzepatide) may improve blood sugar control and aid weight loss, while pure GIPR blockers might suppress appetite but could impair insulin sensitivity. This supports using GIPR‑activating compounds for metabolic health rather than antagonists, though human studies are still needed.

Summary

In mice, activating the GIP receptor (like tirzepatide does) helped control blood sugar and, in obese mice, lowered food intake and weight, while blocking the receptor also cut appetite but made insulin work worse. Both drugs raised liver fat a bit, and neither changed bone markers.

Abstract

Targeting the glucose dependent insulinotropic polypeptide receptor (GIPR) is of growing interest for treating type 2 diabetes and obesity, though the optimal approach remains unclear. Both GIPR agonism and antagonism, respectively, incorporated into drugs like tirzepatide and maridebart cafraglutide, have paradoxically both shown significant weight loss effects in humans. In this study, the metabolic impacts of a GIPR agonist (GIP108) and antagonist (NN-GIPR-Ant) were evaluated in lean and high-fat diet (HFD)-induced obese male mice. We assessed the impacts on food intake, body weight, glucose and insulin tolerance, liver triglyceride levels, bone markers and adipose tissue lipolytic gene expression. In lean mice, neither peptide affected food intake or body weight, but GIP108 improved glucose tolerance. In obese mice, both agents reduced food intake and body weight, with NN-GIPR-Ant producing more sustained appetite suppression. Energy expenditure remained unchanged, as weight loss matched that of pair-fed controls. GIP108 improved glucose tolerance independently of weight loss, whereas NN-GIPR-Ant reduced insulin sensitivity compared to pair-fed controls. Both treatments slightly increased liver triglyceride content compared to their pair-fed controls, and no treatment significantly affected plasma bone marker levels. Finally, NN-GIPR-Ant reduced the expression of adipose tissue lipolytic genes. Our data highlights the distinct metabolic effects of GIPR agonism and antagonism, offering insights for their future application in personalised metabolic disease treatments. Further human studies are needed to understand the long-term metabolic impacts of these therapies.

Study Information

Provider

pubmed

Year

2025

Date

2025-11-24T00:00:00.000Z

DOI

10.1111/dom.70300

References

21