Improved health-related quality of life with tirzepatide versus semaglutide in adults with obesity or overweight from the SURMOUNT-5 trial.
Shukla. Alpana P AP; Dunn. Julia P JP; Gomez Valderas. Elisa E; Fraseur Brumm. Julia J; Karanikas. Chrisanthi A CA; Hunter Gibble. Theresa T
Key Findings
- Tirzepatide led to greater weight loss than semaglutide over 72 weeks.
- Both drugs improved physical health scores, but tirzepatide showed larger gains in the General Health domain.
- Larger weight reductions were linked to bigger improvements in physical functioning, pain, and vitality for both drugs.
Practical Outcomes
- If you’re looking to combine weight loss with better overall health perception, tirzepatide may be the more effective option compared to semaglutide. Targeting a higher percentage of weight loss (e.g., >10% of body weight) can amplify benefits in physical function and pain reduction. Consider tirzepatide especially if you have limited baseline physical capacity, as it showed extra gains in that group.
Summary
In a 72‑week study of people with obesity (but no diabetes), tirzepatide helped them lose more weight than semaglutide and also boosted their overall sense of health, especially in areas like general health and physical functioning. While both drugs improved physical health scores, mental health scores stayed about the same. The biggest quality‑of‑life gains were seen in participants who lost the most weight or started with poorer physical function.
Abstract
In SURMOUNT-5, tirzepatide led to greater body weight (BW) reduction versus semaglutide in adults with obesity without T2D. Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) with tirzepatide versus semaglutide in SURMOUNT-5 was evaluated. This analysis included on-treatment data from participants who received ≥1 dose of tirzepatide or semaglutide at their maximum tolerated dose. Changes in prespecified Short Form-36 Health Survey Version 2 (SF-36v2) norm-based scores for the Physical Component Summary (PCS), Mental Component Summary (MCS), and each domain, Patient Health Questionnaire-9, and Patient Global Impression of Status for Physical Activity scores were assessed at Week 72. Post hoc analysis of changes in SF-36v2 scores in participants with limited baseline physical function and by BW reduction thresholds was assessed at Week 72. Baseline scores were similar between treatments and among BW reduction categories. At Week 72, PCS scores improved from baseline with both treatments (p < 0.001). However, MCS scores did not show significant improvements from baseline (p > 0.05 for both treatment arms). All domain scores improved (p ≤ 0.008), with greater improvements in General Health (GH) with tirzepatide versus semaglutide (5.45 vs. 4.20; p = 0.003). Participants with limited physical function improved in PCS, Physical Functioning (PF), and GH with tirzepatide versus semaglutide (p ≤ 0.025). Higher BW reductions were associated with more improvement in PCS, PF, Role-Physical, Bodily Pain (BP), GH, and Vitality scores with tirzepatide and semaglutide (pooled). HRQoL improved with tirzepatide and semaglutide, with greater improvement in GH with tirzepatide, especially in participants with limited baseline physical function. Participants who lost the most BW showed the greatest improvements in PF, BP, and GH.
Study Information
pubmed
2025
2025-11-04T00:00:00.000Z
10.1111/dom.70215
46