Dual trigger versus human chorionic gonadotropin trigger for blastocyst quality and cumulative live birth.
He. Zining Z; Liu. Yalong Y; Huang. Ning N; Liu. Xintong X; Zeng. Lin L; Lian. Ying Y; Li. Rong R; Chi. Hongbin H
Key Findings
- Number of eggs retrieved, mature eggs, blastocysts, and euploid blastocysts were virtually the same between dual trigger (triptorelinâŻ+âŻhCG) and hCGâonly groups
- Cumulative liveâbirth rate was identical (24.9%) for both trigger methods
- Statistical analysis showed the trigger type did not predict a higher liveâbirth rate (ORâŻââŻ1.04, not significant)
Practical Outcomes
- Adding triptorelin to hCG for egg maturation offers no measurable benefit, so a simpler hCGâonly protocol is sufficient. For those experimenting with fertilityârelated biohacks, thereâs no need to include triptorelin to boost embryo quality or pregnancy success.
Summary
In a study of IVF cycles that used genetic testing on embryos, adding the peptide triptorelin to the usual hCG trigger didnât change how many goodâquality embryos were made or how many babies were born, compared to using hCG alone.
Abstract
To evaluate the difference in the number of euploid blastocysts and cumulative live birth rate (LBR) between dual and human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) triggers in poor and normal ovarian responders undergoing preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) cycles. This retrospective cohort study was enrolled from July 2018 to December 2021 and followed up until June 2024 at a single reproductive medical center. Overall, 1040 in vitro fertilization (IVF)-PGT and 784 frozen-thawed embryo transfer (FET) cycles were assessed. Dual (triptorelin acetate 0.2 mg and recombinant hCG [rhCG] 250 µg) or hCG (rhCG 250 µg) trigger was used for oocyte maturation in the gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist protocol and PGT cycles. We assessed the embryo outcomes and FET cumulative pregnancy outcomes. The number of oocytes retrieved (10.17 ± 5.22 vs 10.27 ± 5.14, P = 0.789), MII oocytes (8.24 ± 4.26 vs 8.28 ± 4.05, P = 0.888), blastocysts (2.16 ± 1.50 vs 2.12 ± 1.49, P = 0.729), euploid blastocysts (1.06 ± 1.14 vs 1.09 ± 1.23, P = 0.726), and the rate of cumulative LBR (24.9% vs 24.9%, P = 1.000) in the dual trigger group were comparable with those in the hCG group. The trigger method was not correlated with higher LBR based on logistic regression analysis (odds ratio[OR] = 1.040 [0.778-1.392], P = 0.790). For poor and normal ovarian responders, the dual trigger, compared with the hCG trigger, did not improve the PGT embryo outcomes and FET cumulative pregnancy outcomes.
Study Information
pubmed
2024
2024-11-16T00:00:00.000Z
10.1007/s10815-024-03293-5
1
35