Menu
Peptide Database
Results
No peptides found
Featured

Use search to browse all 100+ peptides

Triptorelin

Decapeptyl, Trelstar, Gonapeptyl, Pamorelin

Quick Stats
Studies 178
Trials 100
Score 2
2023 pubmed

[No improvement in live birth rate after luteal phase support by GnRH agonist].

Le Levreur. B B; Frantz. S S; Lambert. M M; Chansel-Debordeaux. L L; Bernard. V V; Carriere. J J; Verdy. G G; Hocke. C C

Key Findings

  • Live birth rates were similar with progesterone alone (24.1%) and with progesterone + triptorelin (21.2%).
  • Pregnancy and miscarriage rates did not differ significantly between the two groups.
  • Multivariate analysis adjusting for age, ovarian reserve and infertility duration found no benefit from the extra triptorelin dose.

Practical Outcomes

  • For people experimenting with IVF protocols, adding a 0.1 mg triptorelin shot in the luteal phase appears unnecessary and adds cost without improving outcomes. Stick with standard progesterone support unless new evidence emerges.

Summary

Adding a single dose of the GnRH‑agonist triptorelin to the usual progesterone support after IVF does not boost the chance of having a baby, nor does it change pregnancy or miscarriage rates, according to this retrospective study of 341 cycles.

Abstract

To evaluate the impact of adding a GnRH agonist (GnRH-a) in luteal phase support (LPS) on live birth rates in IVF/ICSI in antagonist protocols. In total, 341 IVF/ICSI attempts are analyzed in this retrospective study. Patients were divided into two groups: A f: LPS with progesterone alone (179 attempts) between March 2019 and May 2020; B: LPS with progesterone and an injection of triptorelin (GnRH-a) 0.1mg 6 days after oocyte retrieval (162 attempts) between June 2020 and June 2021. The primary outcome was live birth rate. The secondary outcomes were miscarriage rate, pregnancy rate and ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome rate. The baseline characteristic are identical between the two groups except the infertility duration (longer in the group B). There was no significant difference between the two groups in live birth rate (24.1% versus 21.2%), pregnancy rate (33.3% versus 28.1%), miscarriage rate (4.9% versus 3.4%) and no increase the SHSO rate. The multivariate regression analysis after adjustment for age, ovarian reserve and infertility duration did not reveal a significant difference in live birth rate between the two groups. In this study, the results showed no statistically significant association with the single injection of a GnRH-a in addition to progesterone on live birth rate in luteal phase support.

Study Information

Provider

pubmed

Year

2023

Date

2023-03-04T00:00:00.000Z

DOI

10.1016/j.gofs.2023.02.005