Menu
Peptide Database
Results
No peptides found
Featured

Use search to browse all 100+ peptides

Triptorelin

Decapeptyl, Trelstar, Gonapeptyl, Pamorelin

Quick Stats
Studies 178
Trials 100
Score 1
2021 pubmed 7 citations

GnRH agonist supplementation in hormone replacement therapy-frozen embryo transfer cycles: a randomized controlled trial.

Alsbjerg. Birgit B; Kesmodel. Ulrik S US; Elbaek. Helle O HO; Laursen. Rita R; Laursen. Steen B SB; Andreasen. Dorthe D; Povlsen. Betina B BB; Humaidan. Peter P

Key Findings

  • Two 0.1 mg boluses of triptorelin gave a non‑significant drop in total pregnancy loss (21% vs 33%).
  • Biochemical pregnancy loss was also lower but not statistically significant (12% vs 25%).
  • Higher luteal progesterone and estradiol levels were linked to higher live‑birth rates, regardless of triptorelin use.

Practical Outcomes

  • There’s no clear reason for biohackers or fertility‑focused self‑experimenters to add triptorelin to standard hormone replacement protocols for frozen embryo transfer. Monitoring and optimizing luteal progesterone and estradiol may be more useful than routine GnRH‑agonist supplementation.

Summary

Adding two small doses of the peptide triptorelin during frozen embryo transfer cycles didn’t clearly lower pregnancy loss, and the study didn’t find strong evidence that it improves live‑birth rates.

Abstract

Will two boluses of gonadotrophin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRHa) during hormone replacement therapy-frozen embryo transfer (HRT-FET) cycles reduce the total pregnancy loss rate? Randomized controlled trial including a total of 287 HRT-FET cycles performed between 2013 and 2019. After randomization participants allocated to the GnRHa group (n = 144) underwent a standard HRT protocol, supplemented with a total of two boluses of triptorelin 0.1 mg; one bolus 2 days before starting vaginal progesterone and one bolus on the 7th day of progesterone. The control group (n = 143) underwent a standard HRT-FET protocol only. The intention-to-treat analysis showed no significant difference in total pregnancy loss between the GnRHa group and the control group (21% versus 33%; relative risk [RR] 0.63, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.35-1.11), nor was the biochemical pregnancy loss per positive human chorionic gonadotrophin (HCG) significantly lower in the GnRHa group (12%, 8/67) compared with the control group (25%, 18/72) (RR 0.48, 95% CI 0.22-1.02). Participants with a live birth had a significantly higher mean progesterone concentration compared with participants without a live birth (25.0 ± 12.2 versus 23.8 ± 8.9 nmol/l; P = 0.001). Furthermore, a trend for a higher live birth rate (LBR) correlated with the highest oestradiol quartile concentration (oestradiol >0.957 nmol/l). Although a difference of 14% in biochemical loss and 12% in total pregnancy loss in favour of GnRHa supplementation was seen this did not reach statistical difference. Luteal progesterone and oestradiol concentrations correlate with LBR in the HRT-FET cycle, emphasizing the importance of luteal serum progesterone and oestradiol monitoring.

Study Information

Provider

pubmed

Year

2021

Date

2021-10-31T00:00:00.000Z

DOI

10.1016/j.rbmo.2021.10.019

Citations

7