Menu
Peptide Database
Results
No peptides found
Featured

Use search to browse all 100+ peptides

GHRP-2

Pralmorelin, Growth Hormone Releasing Peptide-2, KP-102

Quick Stats
Studies 230
Trials 1
Score 2
2012 pubmed 48 citations

Metabolism of growth hormone releasing peptides.

Thomas. Andreas A; Delahaut. Philippe P; Krug. Oliver O; Schänzer. Wilhelm W; Thevis. Mario M

Key Findings

  • Only one GHRP‑2 metabolite was previously known; the study identified many new metabolites (at least 28 total across related peptides).
  • Breakdown occurs via exopeptidases, amidases, and endopeptidases, producing predictable fragment patterns.
  • A combined UHPLC‑Orbitrap and Q‑TOF workflow, with deuterated internal standards, reliably extracts and detects these metabolites in urine.

Practical Outcomes

  • For biohackers, the main takeaway is that GHRP‑2 is rapidly metabolized into many small fragments, which could affect its duration of action and side‑effect profile. While the study doesn’t provide dosing advice, it highlights that standard testing can now catch GHRP‑2 use, so users should be aware of detection risk and the limited data on long‑term safety.

Summary

Scientists studied how the growth‑hormone‑releasing peptide GHRP‑2 (and similar short peptides) is broken down in the body and how to detect its waste products in urine. They gave the peptide to rats, mixed it with human blood, and used advanced mass‑spectrometry tools to map at least 28 different breakdown products. This work mainly helps anti‑doping labs spot illegal use, rather than telling users how to dose or what benefits to expect.

Abstract

New, potentially performance enhancing compounds have frequently been introduced to licit and illicit markets and rapidly distributed via worldwide operating Internet platforms. Developing fast analytical strategies to follow these new trends is one the most challenging issues for modern doping control analysis. Even if reference compounds for the active drugs are readily obtained, their unknown metabolism complicates effective testing strategies. Recently, a new class of small C-terminally amidated peptides comprising four to seven amino acid residues received considerable attention of sports drug testing authorities due to their ability to stimulate growth hormone release from the pituitary. The most promising candidates are the growth hormone releasing peptide (GHRP)-1, -2, -4, -5, -6, hexarelin, alexamorelin, and ipamorelin. With the exemption of GHRP-2, the entity of these peptides represents nonapproved pharmaceuticals; however, via Internet providers, all compounds are readily available. To date, only limited information on the metabolism of these substances is available and merely one metabolite for GHRP-2 is established. Therefore, a comprehensive in vivo (po and iv administration in rats) and in vitro (with human serum and recombinant amidase) study was performed in order to generate information on urinary metabolites potentially useful for routine doping controls. The urine samples from the in vivo experiments were purified by mixed-mode cation-exchange solid-phase extraction and analyzed by ultrahigh-performance liquid chromatography (UHPLC) separation followed by high-resolution/high-accuracy mass spectrometry. Combining the high resolution power of a benchtop Orbitrap mass analyzer for the first metabolite screening and the speed of a quadrupole/time-of-flight (Q-TOF) instrument for identification, urinary metabolites were screened by means of a sensitive full scan analysis and subsequently confirmed by high-accuracy product ion scan experiments. Two deuterium-labeled internal standards (triply deuterated GHRP-4 and GHRP-2 metabolite) were used to optimize the extraction and analysis procedure. Overall, 28 metabolites (at least three for each GHRP) were identified from the in vivo samples and main metabolites were confirmed by the human in vitro model. All identified metabolites were formed due to exopeptidase- (amino- or carboxy-), amidase-, or endopeptidase activity.

Study Information

Provider

pubmed

Year

2012

Date

2012-11-13T00:00:00.000Z

DOI

10.1021/ac302034w

Citations

48

References

23