Ghrelin receptor agonist, GHRP-2, produces antinociceptive effects at the supraspinal level via the opioid receptor in mice.
Zeng. Ping P; Li. Shu S; Zheng. Yue-hui YH; Liu. Fu-Yan FY; Wang. Jing-lei JL; Zhang. Da-lei DL; Wei. Jie J
Key Findings
- Intracerebroventricular GHRP‑2 produces dose‑ and time‑dependent antinociception in mice.
- The analgesic effect is blocked by a ghrelin‑receptor antagonist and by opioid antagonists for delta and kappa receptors, indicating those pathways are involved.
- GHRP‑2 enhances morphine‑induced analgesia, and this enhancement is not reversed by the ghrelin‑receptor antagonist.
Practical Outcomes
- For DIY health enthusiasts, the study suggests GHRP‑2 might have pain‑relieving properties and could interact with opioid pathways, but the brain‑injection route used in mice isn’t applicable to humans. Oral or peripheral GHRP‑2 is unlikely to produce the same central effects, so there’s no actionable dosing protocol for analgesia at this time. It remains a research finding that could inform future drug development rather than a ready‑to‑use biohack.
Summary
In mice, injecting the ghrelin‑like peptide GHRP‑2 directly into the brain reduced pain. The pain‑relief depended on the ghrelin receptor and also involved certain opioid receptors, and GHRP‑2 boosted the effect of morphine. This points to a possible link between the ghrelin system and opioid‑mediated pain control, but the study used a brain injection method that isn’t practical for humans.
Abstract
GHRP-2 is a synthetic agonist of ghrelin receptor. GHRP-2 has similar physiological functions with ghrelin. In our previous study, ghrelin (i.c.v.) could induce analgesic effect through an interaction with GHS-R1α and with the central opioid system in the acute pain in mice. To date, the function of GHRP-2 in pain processing was not understood. Therefore the aim of this study was to investigate the effects of GHRP-2 on pain modulation at supraspinal level in mice using the tail immersion test. Intracerebroventricular (i.c.v.) administration of GHRP-2 (0.1, 0.3, 1, 3 and 10 nmol/L) produced a concentration- and time-related antinociceptive effect. This effect could be fully antagonized by GHS-R1α antagonist [d-Lys(3)]-GHRP-6, indicating that the analgesic effect induced by GHRP-2 is mediated through the activation of GHS-R1α. Interestingly, naloxone, naltrindole and nor-binaltorphimine, but not β-funaltrexamine, could also block the analgesic effect markedly, suggesting that δ- and κ-opioid receptor is involved in the analgesic response evoked by GHRP-2. Moreover, i.c.v. administration of GHRP-2 potentiated the analgesic effect induced by morphine (i.c.v., 1 nmol/L) and this potentiated effect could not be reversed by [d-Lys(3)]-GHRP-6. Thus these findings may be a new strategy on investigating the interaction between ghrelin system and opioids on pain modulation. Furthermore, GHRP-2 may be a promising peptide for developing new analgesic drugs.
Study Information
pubmed
2014
2014-03-04T00:00:00.000Z
10.1016/j.peptides.2014.02.013
16
35