Menu
Peptide Database
Results
No peptides found
Featured

Use search to browse all 100+ peptides

GHRP-2

Pralmorelin, Growth Hormone Releasing Peptide-2, KP-102

Quick Stats
Studies 230
Trials 1
Score 3
2011 pubmed 12 citations

Gender, sex-steroid, and secretagogue-selective recovery from growth hormone-induced feedback in older women and men.

Veldhuis. Johannes D JD; Erickson. Dana D; Wigham. Jean J; Weist. Sue S; Miles. John M JM; Bowers. Cyril Y CY

Key Findings

  • GHRP‑2 (and GHRH) can boost GH release even when the body is under negative feedback from a prior GH injection.
  • Supplementing sex steroids (testosterone in men, estradiol in women) further enhances the recovery of GH secretion.
  • Gender influences the magnitude of GH rebound, with men showing higher peak GH levels than women under the same conditions.

Practical Outcomes

  • For biohackers aiming to amplify GH pulses, pairing GHRP‑2 with testosterone (or estradiol for women) may produce a stronger GH response than using the peptide alone. This suggests a protocol that includes sex‑steroid support could be more effective, especially in older adults. However, the study is acute and small, so chronic dosing, safety, and exact timing still need careful experimentation.

Summary

In older men and women, giving a burst of growth hormone normally shuts down the body's own GH release, but this suppression can be lessened if you add a sex hormone (testosterone for men, estradiol for women) and a GH‑releasing peptide like GHRP‑2. The study shows that both the type of secretagogue and the presence of sex steroids help the body bounce back and release more GH, and men tend to get a bigger rebound than women.

Abstract

GH negatively regulates its own secretion. How gender, sex steroids, and secretagogues modulate GH autofeedback is not known. Supplementation with sex steroids and/or a peptidyl secretagogue will enhance the escape of GH from autoinhibition, thus framing a mechanism for amplifying pulsatile GH secretion. Ten healthy postmenopausal women and 10 comparably aged men participated at the Clinical-Translational Science Unit. Randomly ordered, double-blind, prospective crossover treatment with placebo vs. testosterone (men) or placebo vs. estradiol (women). Autofeedback was imposed by an iv pulse of GH. Recovery of feedback inhibition was quantified during constant infusion of saline, GHRH, or GH-releasing peptide-2 (three peptide categories). During negative feedback, total (integrated) GH recovery depended upon gender (P = 0.017), sex hormone (P < 0.001), and peptide category (P < 0.001). Mechanistic analysis revealed that feedback-suppressed nadir GH concentrations were determined by sex-steroid treatment (P = 0.018) but not by gender (P = 0.444). Peak GH escape was controlled by both treatment (P = 0.004) and gender (P = 0.003). Nadir GH and peak GH during feedback were enhanced by GHRH or GHRP-2 (P < 0.001 for both). Gender × peptide (P = 0.012 for nadir GH), treatment × peptide (P < 0.001 total and peak GH), and gender × treatment (P = 0.017 nadir GH) regulated GH recovery interactively. Gender, sex-steroid supplementation, and secretagogue type confer distinct feedback-rescuing effects, introducing a new level of complexity in the control of pulsatile GH regulation.

Study Information

Provider

pubmed

Year

2011

Date

2011-05-25T00:00:00.000Z

DOI

10.1210/jc.2011-0298

Citations

12

References

40