Menu
Peptide Database
Results
No peptides found
Featured

Use search to browse all 100+ peptides

GHRP-2

Pralmorelin, Growth Hormone Releasing Peptide-2, KP-102

Quick Stats
Studies 230
Trials 1
Score 3
2002 pubmed

The effect of two-day treatment of primary cultured ovine somatotropes with GHRP-2 on membrane voltage-gated K+ currents.

Chen. Chen C

Key Findings

  • 48‑hour exposure to GHRP‑2 (10⁻⁞ M) raised the proportion of cells showing spontaneous action potentials from 27% to 51% without altering resting membrane voltage.
  • The same treatment increased the size of voltage‑gated Kâș currents (mainly A‑type and also delayed‑rectifier currents) without changing their kinetic properties.
  • Blocking PKC prevented the Kâș current increase, while inhibiting protein synthesis or transcription also stopped the effect, indicating the need for PKC‑driven new channel production.

Practical Outcomes

  • For biohackers using GHRP‑2, the study suggests that longer‑term (days) exposure might enhance pituitary cell responsiveness to growth‑hormone signals, potentially improving GH release. However, the work was done in sheep cells in a dish, so the exact dose, timing, and safety in humans remain unknown. It supports the idea that chronic GHRP‑2 use could have cellular effects beyond short‑term spikes, but more human research is needed before changing protocols.

Summary

A lab study on sheep pituitary cells found that treating them with the peptide GHRP-2 for two days makes the cells fire more electrical signals and boosts certain potassium channels. This effect needs a specific cell‑signaling pathway (PKC) and new protein production. The changes could help the cells respond better to the body’s own growth‑hormone‑releasing signals.

Abstract

Long-term in vivo treatment with synthetic GH-releasing peptides (GHRPs) enhances the release of GH induced by endogenous GHRH. The mechanism for such an enhancement on GH release is unknown. In this experiment, somatotropes were obtained from ovine pituitaries by enzyme dissociation and enriched by density centrifugation. Membrane voltage and currents were recorded with whole-cell patch-clamp configuration. After 48-h treatment with GHRP-2 (10(-8) M), the percentage of cells with spontaneous action potential was increased (51 vs. 27%) without change of resting potential. This GHRP-2 treatment also increased the amplitude of voltage-gated K+ currents (predominantly transient A-type-like current but also delayed rectifier or K-type-like current) without modification of biophysical kinetics. Down-regulation of protein kinase C (PKC) with phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate at the time of adding GHRP-2 blocked the increase in K+ currents. Inclusion of calphostin C (PKC inhibitor) but not H(89) (protein kinase A inhibitor) significantly reduced the increase in K+ currents by GHRP-2. Inclusion of actinomycin D (transcription inhibitor) or cycloheximide (protein synthesis inhibitor) abolished the increase in K+ currents. These data indicate that 48-h GHRP-2 treatment increases the density of K+ channels via PKC and channel protein synthesis. Such a modification on K+ channels by GHRP-2 may be partially responsible for the change of somatotrope electrophysiological properties and sensitivity to GHRH stimulation.

Study Information

Provider

pubmed

Year

2002

DOI

10.1210/endo.143.7.8916