Menu
Peptide Database
Results
No peptides found
Featured

Use search to browse all 100+ peptides

GHRP-2

Pralmorelin, Growth Hormone Releasing Peptide-2, KP-102

Quick Stats
Studies 230
Trials 1
Score 3
2000 pubmed 23 citations

Pretreatment with growth hormone-releasing peptide-2 directly protects against the diastolic dysfunction of myocardial stunning in an isolated, blood-perfused rabbit heart model.

Weekers. F F; Van Herck. E E; Isgaard. J J; Van den Berghe. G G

Key Findings

  • 14‑day pretreatment with GHRP‑2 (160 ”g/kg/day, split into two SC doses) halved the rise in end‑diastolic pressure after ischemia, restoring diastolic function to normal levels.
  • The same pretreatment with recombinant human GH increased IGF‑1 and body weight but did not improve diastolic recovery.
  • No increase in markers of apoptosis was observed in any group, indicating the protection was not due to reduced cell death.

Practical Outcomes

  • For biohackers, the study suggests that a sustained GHRP‑2 regimen might offer cardioprotective benefits, especially for diastolic performance after stress. However, the data are from an isolated rabbit heart model, and the dose used (≈0.16 mg/kg/day) is far higher than typical human dosing, so direct translation to personal protocols is premature. More human research is needed before recommending GHRP‑2 for heart protection.

Summary

In a rabbit heart study, giving GHRP‑2 daily for two weeks before a brief heart blockage helped the heart recover its filling ability (diastolic function) after the blockage, while a similar treatment with growth hormone did not. The protective effect was seen without extra cell death, suggesting GHRP‑2 may act as a heart‑protective agent in stress situations.

Abstract

Brief coronary occlusion followed by reperfusion leads to reversible myocardial dysfunction (stunning) which can induce irreversible damage of other organ systems. We studied the effects of pretreatment with recombinant human GH (rhGH) and the GH-secretagogue GHRP-2 on myocardial stunning in a blood-perfused isolated rabbit heart model. In a first set of experiments, effects of bolus rhGH administration (3.5 mg/kg) (n = 5) into the aortic root of unpretreated animals were compared with those of saline (n = 6). In a second set, animals were pretreated for 14 days with SC rhGH 3.5 mg/kg x day (n = 9) or 160 microg/kg x day GHRP-2 (n = 8) in two divided doses. Body weight and plasma concentrations of rhGH, rabbit GH (rGH) and IGF-I were determined before and at the end of 14 days pretreatment. Hearts were excised and submitted to 15 min ischemia followed by 80 min reperfusion, after which postischemic recovery was compared with nonischemic hearts mounted into the same system. At study end, all hearts were snap-frozen to examine markers of apoptosis. Circulating levels of rabbit GH (rGH) remained identical in all animals. Pretreatment with rhGH for 14 days induced a 142 +/- 116% rise of serum IGF-I vs. 8 +/- 15% with GHRP-2 (P < 0.001) and increased body weight with 6.8 +/- 2.5% vs. 3.4 +/- 3.3% with GHRP-2 (P = 0.01). A bolus injection of rhGH did not alter myocardial function compared with saline allowing data from these experiments to be pooled into one ischemic control group for further analysis of the effect of pretreatment. No difference in postischemic recovery of left ventricular systolic function among the unpretreated, rhGH pretreated and GHRP-2 pretreated hearts was apparent. At the end of reperfusion, a 3-fold higher end-diastolic pressure (EDP) persisted in the unpretreated and rhGH pretreated hearts compared with the nonischemic hearts. In the GHRP-2 pretreated hearts, EDP decreased to half the pressure observed in unpretreated and rhGH pretreated hearts (all P < or = 0.02), a level which was indistinguishable from that in the non-ischemic hearts, suggesting full postischemic recovery of diastolic function. There were no signs of increased apoptosis in the experimental groups. In conclusion, 14 days pretreatment with GHRP-2, but not rhGH, protected selectively against the diastolic dysfunction of myocardial stunning in this model. This observation may open perspectives for GH-secretagogues as cardioprotective agents.

Study Information

Provider

pubmed

Year

2000

Date

2000-11-01T00:00:00.000Z

DOI

10.1210/endo.141.11.7768

Citations

23

References

37