Reduction of free fatty acids by acipimox enhances the growth hormone (GH) responses to GH-releasing peptide 2 in elderly men.
Van Dam. P S PS; Smid. H E HE; de Vries. W R WR; Niesink. M M; Bolscher. E E; Waasdorp. E J EJ; Dieguez. C C; Casanueva. F F FF; Koppeschaar. H P HP
Key Findings
- Acipimox cut blood free fatty acids from 607 to 180 ”mol/L.
- GH response (AUC) to GHRPâ2 rose from 1834 to 2956 ”g·Lâ»Âč·minâ»Âč after acipimox pretreatment.
- GHRPâ2 alone produced a GH response 4.8âtimes larger than GHRH alone.
- Higher baseline FFAs were linked to lower GH release, while lowering FFAs boosted GH output.
Practical Outcomes
- For biohackers aiming to maximize GH spikes, taking an antilipolytic agent like acipimox (or another safe FFAâlowering strategy) before a GHRPâ2 dose could significantly amplify the hormone surge. This protocol may be especially useful for older adults whose natural GH secretion has declined, but it should be tried with medical supervision due to drug interactions and sideâeffects.
Summary
In older men, lowering the amount of free fatty acids in the blood with a drug called acipimox makes the growthâhormoneâreleasing peptide GHRPâ2 trigger a much bigger burst of growth hormone. The study shows that the pituitary can still release a lot of GH when the fattyâacid level is reduced, and that GHRPâ2 alone already works better than the classic GHRH peptide.
Abstract
GH release is increased by reducing circulating free fatty acids (FFAs). Aging is associated with decreased plasma GH concentrations. We evaluated GH releasing capacity in nine healthy elderly men after administration of GH-releasing peptide 2 (GHRP-2), with or without pretreatment with the antilipolytic drug acipimox, and compared the GHRP-2-induced GH release with the response to GHRH. The area under the curve (AUC) of the GH response after GHRP-2 alone was 4.8 times higher compared with GHRH alone (1834 +/- 255 vs. 382 +/- 78 microg/L.60 min, P: < 0.001). Acipimox, which reduced FFAs from 607 micromol/L to 180 micromol/L, increased the GH AUC to 1087 after GHRH and to 2956 microg/L.60 min after GHRP-2 (P: < 0.01). The AUC after acipimox/GHRP-2 were positively correlated with the AUC after GHRP-2 alone (r = 0.93, P: < 0.01); this was also observed between acipimox/GHRH and GHRH alone (r = 0.73, P: = 0.03). Significant negative correlations were observed between basal FFAs and AUC after GHRH or GHRP-2 after combining the data with and without acipimox (r = 0.58, P: = 0.01 and r = 0.48, P: = 0.04, respectively), and between basal FFAs and GH at t = 0 (r = -0.44, P: = 0.001). Interestingly, GHRP-2 administration was followed by a significant early rise in plasma FFAs by 60% (P = 0.01), indicating an acute lipolytic effect. In conclusion, reduction of circulating FFAs strongly enhances GHRP-2-stimulated GH release in elderly men. The data indicate that the decreased GH release associated with aging can be reversed by acipimox and that the pituitary GH secretory capacity in elderly men is still sufficient.
Study Information
pubmed
2000
10.1210/jcem.85.12.7087