Menu
Peptide Database
Results
No peptides found
Featured

Use search to browse all 100+ peptides

GHRP-6

Growth Hormone Releasing Peptide-6, Growth hormone-releasing hexapeptide, His-D-Trp-Ala-Trp-D-Phe-Lys-NH2

A synthetic hexapeptide that stimulates growth hormone secretion by mimicking ghrelin and binding to GHS receptors in the pituitary gland.

Quick Stats
Studies 702
Trials 0
Formula C46H56N12O6
Clear All
pubmed Dec 1, 1999

GHRP-6-induced changes in electrical activity of single cells in the arcuate, ventromedial and periventricular nucleus neurones [correction of nuclei] of a hypothalamic slice preparation in vitro.

Hewson. A K AK; Viltart. O O; McKenzie. D N DN; Dyball. R E RE; Dickson. S L SL

Previously, we demonstrated that systemic injection of the growth hormone secretagogue, growth hormone-releasing peptide (GHRP)-6, selectively activated cells in the hypothalamic arcuate nucleus, as reflected by increased electrical activity and induction of the immediate early gene c-fos. The growth hormone secretagogue receptor distribution is not confined to the arcuate nucleus, suggesting that additional sites of action may exist. In the present study we characterized the electrophysiological responses of cells in the arcuate nucleus, ventromedial nucleus and periventricular nucleus in an in-vitro hypothalamic slice preparation, following bath application of GHRP-6. Additionally, since central somatostatin administration has been shown to attenuate the induction of the c-fos gene by GHRP-6, we sought to determine whether the arcuate cells activated by GHRP-6 are also somatostatin-sensitive. Male Wistar rats (100-150 g body weight (BW)) were anaesthetized (urethane; 1.2 g/kg BW) and the brains removed. Coronal sections (400 microm thickness) were cut through a block of hypothalamus and were transferred to a slice chamber perfused with artificial cerebrospinal fluid. Forty-one arcuate nucleus cells were tested with bath application of 15 microm GHRP-6 for 10 min, 16 of which were tested subsequently (>30 min later) with application of 10 microM somatostatin. Following GHRP-6 administration, 19 cells (46. 3%) showed a significant increase in firing rate during the 15-min period after GHRP-6 application (P<0.001), 17 cells (41.5%) did not respond and the remaining five cells (12.2%) were significantly inhibited. Six of the eight arcuate nucleus cells that were excited by GHRP-6 were significantly inhibited by somatostatin. By contrast, five of the six arcuate nucleus cells that were unresponsive to GHRP-6 were also unresponsive to somatostatin. In the ventromedial nucleus, of 19 cells tested, eight cells (42.1%) were excited by GHRP-6, eight cells (42.1%) were unresponsive and the remaining three cells (15.8%) were significantly inhibited. Of 19 cells recorded in the periventricular nucleus, 13 (68.4%) were unresponsive to GHRP-6 and six (31.6%) were significantly inhibited. Thus, electrophysiological studies in vitro suggest that: (1) neurones in the hypothalamic arcuate nucleus, ventromedial nucleus and periventricular nucleus show changes in electrical activity in response to GHRP-6; and (2) the arcuate nucleus cells excited by GHRP-6 are also subject to inhibitory control by somatostatin.

pubmed 2003

Comparison between insulin tolerance test, growth hormone (GH)-releasing hormone (GHRH), GHRH plus acipimox and GHRH plus GH-releasing peptide-6 for the diagnosis of adult GH deficiency in normal subjects, obese and hypopituitary patients.

Cordido. Fernando F; Alvarez-Castro. Paula P; Isidro. Maria Luisa ML; Casanueva. Felipe F FF; Diegue...

It has been gradually realized that GH may have important physiological functions in adult humans. The biochemical diagnosis of adult GHD is established by provocative testing of GH secretion. The insulin-tolerance test (ITT) is the best validated. The ITT has been challenged because of its low degree of reproducibility and lack of normal range, and is contra-indicated in common clinical situations. Furthermore, in severely obese subjects the response to the ITT frequently overlaps with those found in non-obese adult patients with GHD. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the diagnostic capability of four different stimuli of GH secretion: ITT, GHRH, GHRH plus acipimox (GHRH+Ac), and GHRH plus GHRP-6 (GHRH+GHRP-6), in two pathophysiological situations: hypopituitarism and obesity, and normal subjects. Eight adults with hypopituitarism (four female, four male) aged 41-62 Years (48.8+/-1.4 Years), ten obese normal patients (five female, five male) aged 38-62 Years (48.1+/-2.5 Years), with a body mass index of 34.2+/-1.2 kg/m(2), and ten normal subjects (five female, five male) aged 33-62 Years (48.1+/-2.8 Years) were studied. Four tests were performed on each patient or normal subject: An ITT (0.1 U/kg, 0.15 U/kg for obese, i.v., 0 min), GHRH (100 microg, i.v., 0 min), GHRH (100 microg, i.v., 0 min) preceded by acipimox (250 mg, orally, at -270 min and -60 min) (GHRH+Ac); and GHRH (100 microg, i.v., 0 min) plus GHRP-6 (100 microg, i.v., 0 min) (GHRH+GHRP-6). Serum GH was measured by radioimmunoassay. Statistical analyses were performed by Wilcoxon rank sum and by Mann-Whitney tests. After the ITT the mean peak GH secretion was 1.5+/-0.3 microg/l for hypopituitary, 10.1+/-1.7 microg/l (P<0.05 vs hypopituitary) for obese and 17.8+/-2.0 microg/l (P<0.05 vs hypopituitary) for normal. GHRH-induced GH secretion was 2+/-0.7 microg/l for hypopituitary, 3.9+/-1.2 microg/l (P=NS vs hypopituitary) for obese and 22.2+/-3.8 microg/l (P<0.05 vs hypopituitary) for normal. After GHRH+Ac, mean peak GH secretion was 3.3+/-1.4 microg/l for hypopituitary, 14.2+/-2.7 microg/l (P<0.05 vs hypopituitary) for obese and 35.1+/-5.2 microg/l (P<0.05 vs hypopituitary) for normal. GHRH+GHRP-6 induced mean peak GH secretion of 4.1+/-0.9 microg/l for hypopituitary, 38.5+/-6.5 microg/l (P<0.05 vs hypopituitary) for obese and 68.1+/-5.5 microg/l (P<0.05 vs hypopituitary) for normal subjects. Individually considered, after ITT, GHRH or GHRH+Ac, the maximal response in hypopituitary patients was lower than the minimal response in normal but higher than the minimal response in obese subjects. In contrast, after GHRH+GHRP-6 the maximal response in hypopituitary patients was lower than the minimal response in normal and obese subjects. This study suggests that, in this group of patients, although both acipimox and GHRP-6 partially reverse the functional hyposomamotropism of obesity after GHRH, but are unable to reverse the organic hyposomatotropism of hypopituitarism, the combined test GHRH+GHRP-6 most accurately distinguishes both situations, without the side effects of ITT.

pubmed Sep 30, 2000

GH-releasing hormone and GH-releasing peptide-6 for diagnostic testing in GH-deficient adults.

Popovic. V V; Leal. A A; Micic. D D; Koppeschaar. H P HP; Torres. E E; Paramo. C C; Obradovic. S S;...

The diagnosis of growth hormone (GH) deficiency in adults is based on provocative testing of GH secretion. The insulin tolerance test (ITT), currently the favoured test for this diagnosis, has been criticised for poor reproducibility and inconvenience. Since the combined administration of GH-releasing hormone (GHRH) plus GH-releasing peptide-6 (GHRP-6) is the most potent stimulus of GH secretion, we did a multicentre study comparing GH peaks elicited by ITT with those elicited by the GHRH/GHRP-6 test in healthy controls and GH-deficient individuals (cases). 125 adult patients with organic pituitary disease and 125 healthy individuals were studied. All cases and controls were given GHRH 1 microg per kg bodyweight intravenously plus GHRP-6 1 microg per kg intravenously at 0 min and blood samples were obtained during a subsequent 120 min period. 27 controls and all cases had an ITT. Inclusion criteria were severe GH deficiency--ie, a GH peak after ITT of < or = 3 microg/L. Results of the GHRH/GHRP-6 test were analysed by receiver-operating characteristic curve methodology. GH peaks seen after the GHRH/GHRP-6 test did not result in any side-effects and were not affected by age, sex, amount of adipose tissue, or by the GH assay system used. The GH mean peak after the GHRH/GHRP-6 test was 59.2 microg/L (SD 2.2) for controls and 4.1 microg/L (0.3) for cases, whereas after ITT the mean peak was 14.3 microg/L (1.7) and 0.5 microg/L (0.06), respectively. The differential peak responses of controls and cases was greater (p<0.001), for GHRH/GHRP-6 test than for ITT. When individually analysed GH peaks were a continuum, from 139.0 microg/L to 0.01 microg/L, with a cut-off point of 15.0 microg/L. The GHRH/GHRP-6 test performed well under the ROC curve analysis. For clinical utility, it is then proposed that values > or = 20.00 microg/L be considered normal and < or = 10.00 microg/L as GH deficient. The GHRH/GHRP-6 test is a convenient, safe and reliable test for adult GH deficiency and is not confounded by clinical factors known to alter GH secretory patterns. An evoked GH concentration of > or = 15.0 microg/L accurately distinguishes between healthy and GH-deficient adults.