Interactions of Laurylated and Myristoylated KR12 Fragment of the LL37 Peptide with Polyoxidovanadates.
Kapica. Martyna M; Kamysz. Elżbieta E; Grabowska. Ola O; Tesmar. Aleksandra A; Pająk. Marek M; Chmur. Katarzyna K; Brzeski. Jakub J; Samsonov. Sergey A SA; Wyrzykowski. Dariusz D
Key Findings
- C12‑KR12 and C14‑KR12 bind decavanadate mainly via electrostatic (charge‑based) interactions, not specific docking.
- Both peptides form an alpha‑helical structure in buffer, with the longer C14‑KR12 being more heat‑stable.
- Interaction with decavanadate disrupts the alpha‑helix and lowers thermal stability of the peptides.
Practical Outcomes
- If you’re using LL‑37‑derived peptides or similar lipo‑peptides, high‑dose vanadium compounds might destabilize them, potentially reducing their effectiveness. This isn’t a direct protocol change, but it flags a possible interaction to watch for when combining supplements.
Summary
The study examined how two short, fatty‑acid‑linked pieces of the human antimicrobial peptide LL‑37 (C12‑KR12 and C14‑KR12) stick to a negatively charged vanadium cluster (decavanadate). They bind mainly through charge attractions, and the vanadium cluster weakens the peptides’ helical shape, especially when heated.
Abstract
Isothermal titration calorimetry (ITC), circular dichroism (CD) spectroscopy, and molecular dynamics simulations were applied to describe interactions between lipopeptides and decavanadate ions ([V<sub>10</sub>O<sub>28</sub>]<sup>6-</sup>). The selected lipopeptides are conjugates of the amide of the KR12 peptide, the smallest antimicrobial peptide derived from human cathelicidin LL-37, with lauric acid (C12-KR12) and myristic acid (C14-KR12). The smaller sizes of C12-KR12 and C14-KR12 compared to proteins allow for the rigorous characterization of their non-covalent interactions with highly negatively charged [V<sub>10</sub>O<sub>28</sub>]<sup>6-</sup> ions. The stoichiometry of the resulting decavanadate-peptide complexes and the thermodynamic parameters (Δ<i>G</i>, Δ<i>H</i>, and TΔ<i>S</i>) of the interactions were determined. The ITC results, supported by the MD simulation, showed that the binding of cationic lipopeptides for decavanadate is rather non-specific and is driven by enthalpic contributions resulting from electrostatic interactions between the positively charged residues of the peptides and the anionic decavanadate. Furthermore, the influence of temperature and the interactions with decavanadate ions on the stability of the α-helical structure of the lipopeptides were assessed based on CD spectra. Under the experimental conditions (50 mM sodium cacodylate buffer, pH 5), the peptides adopt an α-helical conformation, with C14-KR12 showing greater thermal stability. The interactions with vanadium species disrupt the α-helical structure and reduce its thermal stability.
Study Information
pubmed
2025
2025-04-02T00:00:00.000Z
10.3390/molecules30071589
1
29