Exploring the Efficacy of Peptides and Mimics against Influenza A Virus, Adenovirus, and Murine Norovirus.
Urmi. Umme Laila UL; Vijay. Ajay Kumar AK; Willcox. Mark D P MDP; Attard. Samuel S; Enninful. George G; Kumar. Naresh N; Islam. Salequl S; Kuppusamy. Rajesh R
Key Findings
- LLâ37 inhibited murine norovirus with an IC50 of 4.2âŻÂ”M, showing activity against a nonâenveloped virus
- LLâ37 and other natural/synthetic AMPs were ineffective against influenza A strains in the assays used
- AMP mimics 610 and Sauâ22 were the most potent against influenza (IC50âŻââŻ2â6âŻÂ”M) while LLâ37 showed no activity
- Electron microscopy revealed AMPs target virus capsids, whereas mimics attack the viral envelope
Practical Outcomes
- LLâ37 might be worth watching for antiviral strategies aimed at nonâenveloped viruses, but thereâs no evidence it helps with flu or other enveloped viruses yet. Biohackers should not selfâadminister LLâ37 for viral protection until human safety and dosing data are available. Exploring peptide mimics that target viral envelopes could be a more promising route for broadâspectrum antiviral projects.
Summary
The study shows that the natural peptide LLâ37 can block a nonâenveloped virus (murine norovirus) in lab tests, but it doesnât work against flu viruses. Other synthetic peptides and smallâmolecule mimics showed different strengths: some stopped flu, others stopped adenovirus, and most didnât affect the norovirus. The way these compounds work seems tied to their charge, size, and shape, not just being a peptide.
Abstract
The ongoing battle against viral pandemics continues, with the possibility of future outbreaks. The search for effective antiviral compounds that can combat a diverse range of viruses continues to be a focal point of research. This study investigated the efficacy of two natural antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) (lactoferricin and LL-37), two synthetic AMPs (melimine and Mel4), and nine AMP mimics (758, 1091, 1096, 1083, 610, NAPL, 3-BIPL, 4-BIPL, and Sau-22) against influenza A virus strains H1N1 and H3N2, human adenovirus 5 (HAdV-5), and murine norovirus 1 (MNV-1). These compounds were tested using virus pre-treatment, cell pre-treatment, or post-cell entry treatment assays, electron microscopy, and circular dichroism (CD), alongside evaluations of cytotoxicity against the host cells. After virus pre-treatment, the AMP mimics 610 and Sau-22 had relatively low IC<sub>50</sub> values for influenza strains H1N1 (2.35 and 6.93 µM, respectively) and H3N2 (3.7 and 5.34 µM, respectively). Conversely, natural and synthetic AMPs were not active against these strains. For the non-enveloped viruses, the AMP Mel4 and mimic 1083 had moderate activity against HAdV-5 (Mel4 IC<sub>50</sub> = 47.4 µM; 1083 IC<sub>50</sub> = 47.2 µM), whereas all AMPs, but none of the mimics, were active against norovirus (LL-37 IC<sub>50</sub> = 4.2 µM; lactoferricin IC<sub>50</sub> = 23.18 µM; melimine IC<sub>50</sub> = 4.8 µM; Mel4 IC<sub>50</sub> = 8.6 µM). Transmission electron microscopy demonstrated that the mimics targeted the outer envelope of influenza viruses, while the AMPs targeted the capsid of non-enveloped viruses. CD showed that Mel4 adopted an α-helical structure in a membrane mimetic environment, but mimic 758 remained unstructured. The diverse activity against different virus groups is probably influenced by charge, hydrophobicity, size, and, in the case of natural and synthetic AMPs, their secondary structure. These findings underscore the potential of peptides and mimics as promising candidates for antiviral therapeutics against both enveloped and non-enveloped viruses.
Study Information
pubmed
2024
2024-06-27T00:00:00.000Z
10.3390/ijms25137030
7
78