Neutrophil functions in patients with neutropenia due to glycogen storage disease type 1b treated with empagliflozin.
Kaczor. Magdalena M; Malicki. Stanislaw S; Folkert. Justyna J; Dobosz. Ewelina E; Bryzek. Danuta D; Chruscicka-Smaga. Barbara B; Greczan. Milena M; Wesół-Kucharska. Dorota D; Piątosa. Barbara B; Samborowska. Emilia E; Madzio. Joanna J; Książyk. Janusz J; Ehmke Vel Emczyńska. Ewa E; Hajdacka. Małgorzata M; Potempa. Jan J; Młynarski. Wojciech W; Rokicki. Dariusz D; Veillard. Florian F
Key Findings
- Empagliflozin increased neutrophil counts and improved phagocytosis, chemotaxis, oxidative burst, and reduced apoptosis compared with G‑CSF
- Serum 1,5‑AG levels dropped in parallel with the immune improvements
- LL‑37 production and neutrophil extracellular trap formation remained low despite treatment
- Six patients could stop G‑CSF injections without extra infections
Practical Outcomes
- Empagliflozin may be a useful off‑label option to boost neutrophil health in GSD‑1b or similar conditions where 1,5‑AG accumulates, but it won’t increase LL‑37 levels. Biohackers should not expect it to act as a general immune‑enhancer, and dosing should follow clinical guidance for GSD‑1b patients.
Summary
In people with a rare metabolic disease (GSD‑1b) that causes low neutrophil counts, the diabetes drug empagliflozin raised the number of neutrophils and fixed many of their functions better than the usual growth‑factor treatment, but it did not restore the antimicrobial peptide LL‑37 or the ability to form neutrophil traps.
Abstract
Neutropenia and neutrophil dysfunction in glycogen storage disease type 1b (GSD1b) are caused by the accumulation of 1,5-anhydroglucitol-6-phosphate in granulocytes. The antidiabetic drug empagliflozin reduces the concentration of 1,5-anhydroglucitol (1,5-AG), thus restoring neutrophil counts and functions, leading to promising results in previous case reports. Here, we present a comprehensive analysis of neutrophil function in 7 patients with GSD1b and 11 healthy donors, aiming to evaluate the immediate (after 3 months) and long-term (after 12 months) efficacy of empagliflozin compared with the reference treatment with granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF). We found that most patients receiving G-CSF remained neutropenic with dysfunctional granulocytes, whereas treatment with empagliflozin increased neutrophil counts and improved functionality by inhibiting apoptosis, restoring phagocytosis and the chemotactic response, normalizing the oxidative burst, and stabilizing cellular and plasma levels of defensins and lactotransferrin. These improvements correlated with the decrease in serum 1,5-AG levels. However, neither G-CSF nor empagliflozin overcame deficiencies in the production of cathelicidin/LL-37 and neutrophil extracellular traps. Given the general improvement promoted by empagliflozin treatment, patients were less susceptible to severe infections. G-CSF injections were therefore discontinued in 6 patients (and the dose was reduced in the seventh) without adverse effects. Our systematic analysis, the most extensive reported thus far, has demonstrated the superior efficacy of empagliflozin compared with G-CSF, restoring the neutrophil population and normal immune functions. This trial was registered as EudraCT 2021-000580-78.
Study Information
pubmed
2024
2024-06-11T00:00:00.000Z
10.1182/bloodadvances.2023012403
7