Evaluation of LL-37 in healing of hard-to-heal venous leg ulcers: A multicentric prospective randomized placebo-controlled clinical trial.
Mahlapuu. Margit M; Sidorowicz. Adam A; Mikosinski. Jacek J; Krzyżanowski. Mikołaj M; Orleanski. Jakub J; Twardowska-Saucha. Krystyna K; Nykaza. Andrzej A; Dyaczynski. Michal M; Belz-Lagoda. Beata B; Dziwiszek. Grzegorz G; Kujawiak. Monika M; Karczewski. Marek M; Sjöberg. Folke F; Grzela. Tomasz T; Wegrzynowski. Adam A; Thunarf. Fredrik F; Björk. Jakob J; Ekblom. Jonas J; Jawien. Arkadiusz A; Apelqvist. Jan J
Key Findings
- No overall healing benefit compared to placebo
- Possible benefit for large ulcers (≥10 cm²) in post‑hoc analysis
- LL-37 was well tolerated with no safety concerns
Practical Outcomes
- For most users LL-37 isn’t a proven ulcer treatment yet. If you have a large, hard‑to‑heal leg ulcer, a future study might confirm a benefit, but you’d need to wait for stronger evidence before using it.
Summary
A phase IIb trial tested a skin cream containing the peptide LL-37 on tough venous leg ulcers. Overall it didn’t heal ulcers faster than a placebo, but in a side analysis people with big wounds (≥10 cm²) seemed to heal better. The cream was safe at both tested doses.
Abstract
Many patients with venous leg ulcers do not reach complete healing with compression treatment alone, which is current standard care. This clinical trial HEAL LL-37 was a phase IIb double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study, with the aim to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a new drug LL-37 for topical administration, in combination with compression therapy, in 148 patients suffering from hard-to-heal venous leg ulcers. The study had three arms, consisting of two groups treated with LL-37 at concentrations of 0.5 or 1.6 mg/mL, and a placebo cohort. Patients had a mean age of 67.6 years, a median ulcer duration of 20.3 months, and a mean wound size at the time of randomization of 11.6 cm<sup>2</sup> . Efficacy analysis performed on the full study population did not identify any significant improvement in healing in patients treated with LL-37 as compared with the placebo. In contrast, a post hoc analysis revealed statistically significant improvement with LL-37 treatment in several interrelated healing parameters in the subgroup of patients with large target wounds (a wound area of at least 10 cm<sup>2</sup> at randomization), which is a known negative prognostic factor for healing. The study drug was well tolerated and safe in both dose strengths. In summary, this clinical trial did not detect any significant differences in healing of venous lower leg ulcers in the entire study cohort comparing patients treated with LL-37 versus placebo. A subgroup analysis provided an interesting observation that LL-37 could offer a treatment benefit in patients with large ulcers, exigently warranting a further study adequately powered to statistically assess the treatment outcome in this patient group.
Study Information
pubmed
2021
2021-10-23T00:00:00.000Z
10.1111/wrr.12977
26
24