Membrane Association Modes of Natural Anticancer Peptides: Mechanistic Details on Helicity, Orientation, and Surface Coverage.
Quemé-Peña. Mayra M; Juhász. Tünde T; Kohut. Gergely G; Ricci. Maria M; Singh. Priyanka P; Szigyártó. Imola Cs IC; Papp. Zita I ZI; Fülöp. Lívia L; Beke-Somfai. Tamás T
Key Findings
- Three distinct membrane‑binding modes were identified: a fully helical surface‑lying mode, a partially helical carpet‑like mode, and a perpendicular upright mode.
- The upright mode is a newly described intermediate that allows the helix to swing while its N‑terminus stays anchored to the membrane headgroups.
- Minor variations in peptide sequence or charge can shift the peptide between these binding modes.
Practical Outcomes
- For biohackers, this work mainly adds mechanistic insight rather than a new protocol. It suggests that tweaking the charge or sequence of LL-37 could change how it interacts with cell membranes, which may be useful for designing safer or more effective peptide supplements, but no direct dosage or usage guidance is provided.
Summary
Scientists studied how the natural peptide LL-37 and similar anticancer peptides stick to cell membranes. They found three different ways the peptides can sit on or attach to the membrane, including a newly seen upright position that might be a step before the peptide actually pierces the membrane. Small changes in the peptide’s sequence or charge can switch which mode it uses.
Abstract
Anticancer peptides (ACPs) could potentially offer many advantages over other cancer therapies. ACPs often target cell membranes, where their surface mechanism is coupled to a conformational change into helical structures. However, details on their binding are still unclear, which would be crucial to reach progress in connecting structural aspects to ACP action and to therapeutic developments. Here we investigated natural helical ACPs, Lasioglossin LL-III, Macropin 1, Temporin-La, FK-16, and LL-37, on model liposomes, and also on extracellular vesicles (EVs), with an outer leaflet composition similar to cancer cells. The combined simulations and experiments identified three distinct binding modes to the membranes. Firstly, a highly helical structure, lying mainly on the membrane surface; secondly, a similar, yet only partially helical structure with disordered regions; and thirdly, a helical monomeric form with a non-inserted perpendicular orientation relative to the membrane surface. The latter allows large swings of the helix while the N-terminal is anchored to the headgroup region. These results indicate that subtle differences in sequence and charge can result in altered binding modes. The first two modes could be part of the well-known carpet model mechanism, whereas the newly identified third mode could be an intermediate state, existing prior to membrane insertion.
Study Information
pubmed
2021
2021-08-10T00:00:00.000Z
10.3390/ijms22168613
14
127