Wound healing activity and mechanism of action of antimicrobial and lipopolysaccharide-neutralizing peptides from enzymatic hydrolysates of rice bran proteins.
Taniguchi. Masayuki M; Saito. Kazuki K; Aida. Ryousuke R; Ochiai. Akihito A; Saitoh. Eiichi E; Tanaka. Takaaki T
Key Findings
- All three peptides increased endothelial cell proliferation at very low concentrations (0.1‑1 µM).
- They promoted tube formation (a model of new blood‑vessel growth) at concentrations above 1 µM, similar to LL‑37.
- RBP‑LRR and RBP‑EKL mainly helped wound closure by enhancing cell migration, while RBP‑SSF worked mainly by boosting cell proliferation.
Practical Outcomes
- These rice‑bran peptides look promising as topical agents for faster wound healing, especially for people interested in natural or DIY skin‑care solutions. However, because the data are limited to cell‑culture experiments, more research (animal studies, safety testing, human trials) is needed before they can be recommended for real‑world use or dosage guidelines.
Summary
Researchers found three rice‑bran‑derived peptides (RBP‑LRR, RBP‑EKL, RBP‑SSF) that can boost skin cell growth, blood‑vessel formation, and cell movement in lab dishes, acting much like the natural peptide LL‑37. These effects suggest the peptides could help wounds close faster, but the work was done only in cell cultures, not in people.
Abstract
In our previous study, we identified multifunctional cationic peptides from enzymatic hydrolysates of rice bran proteins (RBPs) that have antimicrobial and lipopolysaccharide-neutralizing activities. In this study, we investigated the potential of the peptides RBP-LRR, RBP-EKL, and RBP-SSF to promote proliferation, angiogenesis (tube formation), and migration in human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs). To determine mechanisms of wound healing actions, angiogenic and migration-promoting activities of these peptides were evaluated following pretreatments of HUVECs with specific inhibitors. In these experiments, the cationic peptides RBP-LRR, RBP-EKL, and RBP-SSF induced cell proliferation at low concentrations of 0.1 μM or 1 μM. Moreover, the three cationic peptides had angiogenic activities at concentrations more than 1 μM in tube formation assays, and their effects were similar to those of LL-37. Subsequent scratch migration assays exhibited that RBP-LRR, RBP-EKL, and RBP-SSF promote wound closure at optimum concentrations of 10, 10, and 0.1 μM, respectively. In further studies, we performed tube formation assays using HUVECs pretreated with SU5416, which inhibits vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) receptors, and suggested the possibility that the three cationic peptides induce angiogenesis by activating VEGF receptors. In corresponding scratch migration assays using HUVECs, pretreatment with the proliferation inhibitor mitomycin C did not alter the effects of RBP-LRR and RBP-EKL, and significant contribution to wound closure were mediated by cell migration regardless of proliferation rates. In contrast, RBP-SSF contributed to wound closure exclusively by promoting cell proliferation. The present data indicate that RBP-LRR, RBP-EKL, and RBP-SSF are candidates for use as wound healing agents.
Study Information
pubmed
2019
2019-02-21T00:00:00.000Z
10.1016/j.jbiosc.2019.02.002
26
44