Menu
Peptide Database
Results
No peptides found
Featured

Use search to browse all 100+ peptides

LL-37

Cathelicidin, hCAP-18, FALL-39, CAP-18

Quick Stats
Studies 2230
Trials 95
Score 3
2018 pubmed 21 citations

Effects of fluticasone propionate and budesonide on the expression of immune defense genes in bronchial epithelial cells.

van den Berge. M M; Jonker. M R MR; Miller-Larsson. A A; Postma. D S DS; Heijink. I H IH

Key Findings

  • Both BUD and FP suppress CXCL8, IFNB1, and S100A8 in unstimulated bronchial cells.
  • BUD, but not FP, significantly boosts lactotransferrin (LTF) expression at both mRNA and protein levels.
  • In virus‑infected cells, BUD still raises LTF and S100A8 more than FP, but neither drug alters LL‑37 (CAMP) levels.

Practical Outcomes

  • For biohackers managing lung health, choosing budesonide over fluticasone may preserve more of the body’s own antimicrobial defenses, potentially lowering infection risk. However, inhaled steroids do not appear to affect LL‑37 levels, so supplementing LL‑37 directly would need separate strategies.

Summary

A study comparing two inhaled steroids—budesonide (BUD) and fluticasone propionate (FP)—found that BUD lets airway cells keep higher levels of some natural antimicrobial proteins (like lactoferrin and S100A8) than FP, while neither drug changes the amount of the peptide LL‑37. This may explain why COPD patients on FP have a higher pneumonia risk.

Abstract

COPD patients have increased risk of pneumonia when treated with fluticasone propionate (FP), whereas this is generally not the case with budesonide (BUD) treatment. We hypothesized that BUD and FP differentially affect the expression of immune defense genes. Human bronchial epithelial 16HBE cells and air-liquid interface (ALI)-cultured primary bronchial epithelial cells (PBECs) were pre-treated with clinically equipotent concentrations of BUD or FP (0.16-16 nM BUD and 0.1-10 nM FP), and the expression of immune defense genes was studied at baseline and after exposure to rhinovirus (RV16). Using microfluidic cards, we observed that both BUD and FP significantly suppressed CXCL8, IFNB1 and S100A8 mRNA expression in unstimulated 16HBE cells. Interestingly, BUD, but not FP, significantly increased lactotransferrin (LTF) expression. The difference between the effect of BUD and FP on LTF expression was statistically significant and confirmed by qPCR and at the protein level by western blotting. RV16 infection of ALI-cultured PBECs significantly increased the expression of CCL20, IFNB1 and S100A8, but not of LTF or CAMP/LL-37. In these RV16-exposed cells, LTF expression was again significantly higher upon pre-treatment with BUD than with FP. The same was observed for S100A8, but not for CCL20, IFNB1 or CAMP/LL-37 expression. Treatment of human bronchial epithelial cells with BUD results in significantly higher expression of specific immune defense genes than treatment with FP. The differential regulation of these immune defense genes may help to explain the clinical observation that BUD and FP treatment differ with respect to the risk of developing pneumonia in COPD.

Study Information

Provider

pubmed

Year

2018

Date

2018-04-05T00:00:00.000Z

DOI

10.1016/j.pupt.2018.04.002

Citations

21

References

59