Antiviral Activity of the Human Cathelicidin, LL-37, and Derived Peptides on Seasonal and Pandemic Influenza A Viruses.
Tripathi. Shweta S; Wang. Guangshun G; White. Mitchell M; Qi. Li L; Taubenberger. Jeffery J; Hartshorn. Kevan L KL
Key Findings
- Full‑length LL‑37 neutralizes seasonal flu strains (H3N2, mouse‑adapted H1N1) but is much less effective against the 2009 pandemic H1N1 (Cal09).
- The N‑terminal fragment LL‑23 has only weak activity; a modified version LL‑23V9 is slightly better but still modest.
- Short central fragments (FK‑13, KR‑12) show no antiviral effect, while the 20‑amino‑acid central fragment GI‑20 matches LL‑37’s activity and also inhibits the pandemic Cal09 strain.
- None of the peptides block the virus’s hemagglutination or neuraminidase enzymes, indicating a different mechanism of neutralization.
Practical Outcomes
- For DIY health enthusiasts, LL‑37 itself isn’t a reliable broad‑spectrum anti‑flu agent, especially against newer strains. The GI‑20 fragment shows promise as a more universally active piece, but it isn’t commercially available and would require synthesis. At present, the study mainly offers a mechanistic clue for future peptide‑based antivirals rather than an actionable supplement or protocol.
Summary
The natural human peptide LL-37 can block some flu viruses, but it works poorly against the 2009 pandemic H1N1 strain. A shorter piece of the same peptide called GI-20 still stops that pandemic virus, suggesting that the middle part of LL-37 is key for antiviral action.
Abstract
Human LL-37, a cationic antimicrobial peptide, was recently shown to have antiviral activity against influenza A virus (IAV) strains in vitro and in vivo. In this study we compared the anti-influenza activity of LL-37 with that of several fragments derived from LL-37. We first tested the peptides against a seasonal H3N2 strain and the mouse adapted H1N1 strain, PR-8. The N-terminal fragment, LL-23, had slight neutralizing activity against these strains. In LL-23V9 serine 9 is substituted by valine creating a continuous hydrophobic surface. LL-23V9 has been shown to have increased anti-bacterial activity compared to LL-23 and we now show slightly increased antiviral activity compared to LL-23 as well. The short central fragments, FK-13 and KR-12, which have anti-bacterial activity did not inhibit IAV. In contrast, a longer 20 amino acid central fragment of LL-37 (GI-20) had neutralizing activity similar to LL-37. None of the peptides inhibited viral hemagglutination or neuraminidase activity. We next tested activity of the peptides against a strain of pandemic H1N1 of 2009 (A/California/04/09/H1N1 or "Cal09"). Unexpectedly, LL-37 had markedly reduced activity against Cal09 using several cell types and assays of antiviral activity. A mutant viral strain containing just the hemagglutinin (HA) of 2009 pandemic H1N1 was inhibited by LL-37, suggested that genes other than the HA are involved in the resistance of pH1N1. In contrast, GI-20 did inhibit Cal09. In conclusion, the central helix of LL-37 incorporated in GI-20 appears to be required for optimal antiviral activity. The finding that GI-20 inhibits Cal09 suggests that it may be possible to engineer derivatives of LL-37 with improved antiviral properties.
Study Information
pubmed
2015
2015-04-24T00:00:00.000Z
10.1371/journal.pone.0124706
77
37