Scientists mixed parts of three natural antimicrobial proteins to make new hybrid peptides that kill bacteria better than the originals, but they also damage red blood cells more. Tweaking the most harmful hybrid reduced both its killing power and its blood‑cell toxicity, showing a trade‑off between effectiveness and safety.

Antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) are a naturally occurring component of the innate immune response of many organisms and can have activity against both Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacterial species. In order to optimize and improve the direct antimicrobial effect of AMPs against a broad spectrum of bacterial species, novel synthetic hybrids were rationally designed from cecropin A, LL-37 and magainin II. AMPs were selected based on their α-helical secondary structure and fragments of these were analyzed and combined in silico to determine which hybrid peptides would form the best amphipathic cationic α-helices. Four hybrid peptides were synthesized (CaLL, CaMA, LLaMA and MALL) and evaluated for direct antimicrobial activity against a range of bacterial species (Bacillus anthracis, Burkholderia cepacia, Francisella tularensis LVS and Yersinia pseudotuberculosis) alongside the original 'parent' AMPs. The hybrid peptides showed greater antimicrobial effects than the parent AMPs (in one case a parent is completely ineffective while a hybrid based on it removes all traces of bacteria by 3h), although they also demonstrated higher hemolytic properties. Modifications were then carried out to the most toxic hybrid AMP (CaLL) to further improve the therapeutic index. Modifications made to the hybrid lowered hemolytic activity and also lowered antimicrobial activity by various degrees. Overall, this work highlights the potential for rational design and synthesis of improved AMPs that have the capability to be used therapeutically for treatment of bacterial infections.