Suppression of antimicrobial peptide expression by ureaplasma species.
Xiao. Li L; Crabb. Donna M DM; Dai. Yuling Y; Chen. Yuying Y; Waites. Ken B KB; Atkinson. T Prescott TP
Key Findings
- Synthetic LL‑37, hBD‑3, and hBD‑1 kill Ureaplasma parvum and U. urealyticum in vitro.
- Ureaplasma infection reduces the expression of several host antimicrobial peptide genes (DEFB1, DEFA5, DEFA6, CAMP).
- The down‑regulation is linked to changes in chromatin (lower H3K9 acetylation) rather than DNA methylation.
Practical Outcomes
- For biohackers, the data confirm that LL‑37 has activity against Ureaplasma, but the work is limited to cell‑culture experiments and does not provide dosing, delivery methods, or safety information for human use. At present, the findings are mainly of scientific interest and do not translate into an actionable protocol for supplementing or boosting LL‑37 to prevent or treat Ureaplasma infections.
Summary
The study shows that the natural antimicrobial peptide LL‑37 can kill Ureaplasma bacteria in lab tests, but the bacteria can also turn down the body's own production of LL‑37 and other similar peptides, helping them stick around longer.
Abstract
Ureaplasma species commonly colonize the adult urogenital tract and are implicated in invasive diseases of adults and neonates. Factors that permit the organisms to cause chronic colonization or infection are poorly understood. We sought to investigate whether host innate immune responses, specifically, antimicrobial peptides (AMPs), are involved in determining the outcome of Ureaplasma infections. THP-1 cells, a human monocytoid tumor line, were cocultured with Ureaplasma parvum and U. urealyticum. Gene expression levels of a variety of host defense genes were quantified by real-time PCR. In vitro antimicrobial activities of synthetic AMPs against Ureaplasma spp. were determined using a flow cytometry-based assay. Chromosomal histone modifications in host defense gene promoters were tested by chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP). DNA methylation status in the AMP promoter regions was also investigated. After stimulation with U. parvum and U. urealyticum, the expression of cell defense genes, including the AMP genes (DEFB1, DEFA5, DEFA6, and CAMP), was significantly downregulated compared to that of TNFA and IL-8, which were upregulated. In vitro flow cytometry-based antimicrobial assay revealed that synthetic peptides LL-37, hBD-3, and hBD-1 had activity against Ureaplasma spp. Downregulation of the AMP genes was associated with chromatin modification alterations, including the significantly decreased histone H3K9 acetylation with U. parvum infection. No DNA methylation status changes were detected upon Ureaplasma infection. In conclusion, AMPs have in vitro activity against Ureaplasma spp., and suppression of AMP expression might be important for the organisms to avoid this aspect of the host innate immune response and to establish chronic infection and colonization.
Study Information
pubmed
2014
2014-02-03T00:00:00.000Z
10.1128/iai.01231-13