Regulation of cathelicidin antimicrobial peptide expression by an endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress signaling, vitamin D receptor-independent pathway.
Park. Kyungho K; Elias. Peter M PM; Oda. Yuko Y; Mackenzie. Donald D; Mauro. Theodora T; Holleran. Walter M WM; Uchida. Yoshikazu Y
Key Findings
- ER stress increases LL‑37 production in epithelial cells via NF‑κB and C/EBPα, independent of the vitamin D receptor.
- Both secretion and proteolytic processing of CAMP to LL‑37 are needed for its antimicrobial activity after ER stress.
- Topical application of an ER stressor raises the mouse LL‑37 homologue in skin, and ER stress actually suppresses vitamin D‑driven VDR activation but doesn’t affect the ER‑stress‑driven LL‑37 rise.
Practical Outcomes
- Mild, safe ways to create low‑level ER stress (e.g., heat exposure, sauna, controlled UV) might be explored to naturally enhance LL‑37 and innate immunity, especially if vitamin D levels are low. However, strong ER‑stress drugs like thapsigargin are toxic and not suitable for self‑administration. Use caution and prioritize safer stress‑inducing practices.
Summary
The study shows that stressing the cell’s protein‑folding system (ER stress) can boost the body’s natural antimicrobial peptide LL‑37 in skin cells, using a pathway that doesn’t need vitamin D. This boost requires the peptide to be secreted and cut into its active form, and it works even when vitamin D signaling is blocked. While the chemicals used in the lab are toxic, the finding hints that milder stressors (like heat or UV) might raise LL‑37 levels without relying on vitamin D.
Abstract
Vitamin D receptor (VDR)-dependent mechanisms regulate human cathelicidin antimicrobial peptide (CAMP)/LL-37 in various cell types, but CAMP expression also increases after external perturbations (such as infection, injuries, UV irradiation, and permeability barrier disruption) in parallel with induction of endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress. We demonstrate that CAMP mRNA and protein expression increase in epithelial cells (human primary keratinocytes, HaCaT keratinocytes, and HeLa cells), but not in myeloid (U937 and HL-60) cells, following ER stress generated by two mechanistically different, pharmacological stressors, thapsigargin or tunicamycin. The mechanism for increased CAMP following exposure to ER stress involves NF-κB activation leading to CCAAT/enhancer-binding protein α (C/EBPα) activation via MAP kinase-mediated phosphorylation. Furthermore, both increased CAMP secretion and its proteolytic processing to LL-37 are required for antimicrobial activities occur following ER stress. In addition, topical thapsigargin also increases production of the murine homologue of CAMP in mouse epidermis. Finally and paradoxically, ER stress instead suppresses the 1,25(OH)(2) vitamin D(3)-induced activation of VDR, but blockade of VDR activity does not alter ER stress-induced CAMP up-regulation. Hence, ER stress increases CAMP expression via NF-κB-C/EBPα activation, independent of VDR, illuminating a novel VDR-independent role for ER stress in stimulating innate immunity.
Study Information
pubmed
2011
2011-08-08T00:00:00.000Z
10.1074/jbc.m111.250431