The antimicrobial skin barrier in patients with atopic dermatitis.
Schittek. Birgit B
Key Findings
- Older studies said LL‑37 and other AMPs are low in eczema skin, but newer data show they can be equal or higher than in normal skin.
- Despite higher AMP levels, eczema patients remain highly susceptible to Staphylococcus aureus infections, suggesting functional impairment or insufficient amounts.
- Therapeutic strategies that boost AMP production (including LL‑37) and repair the skin barrier could improve infection resistance in atopic dermatitis.
Practical Outcomes
- For biohackers, the take‑away is that simply adding more LL‑37 may not fix eczema‑related infections; you also need to focus on restoring the skin’s barrier (e.g., with ceramide‑rich moisturizers, barrier‑repair creams). While topical LL‑37 products are not yet proven, supporting AMP expression through vitamin D, zinc, or mild irritant‑free skin care could be a modest, low‑risk approach.
Summary
In people with eczema (atopic dermatitis), the skin’s natural antimicrobial peptide LL‑37 isn’t always low – newer studies show it can be as high or higher than in healthy skin. However, these patients still get frequent Staph infections, meaning the peptide either isn’t working well enough or other factors (like a leaky barrier) are to blame. Raising LL‑37 levels and fixing the skin’s barrier might help the skin fight germs better.
Abstract
Keratinocytes represent the major cell population in the epithelial skin barrier and actively participate in innate immune responses by recognizing pathogenic microorganisms, followed by a fine-tuned production of cytokines, chemokines and antimicrobial peptides or proteins (AMPs). Patients with atopic dermatitis (AD) suffer from a defective permeability barrier which favors pathogen infection indicating that the permeability and antimicrobial barrier functions are interdependent. Several early studies showed that the inducible AMPs LL-37, HBD-2 and HBD-3 are expressed at lower levels in atopic skin compared to psoriatic skin. However, recent data indicate that AMP induction is not compromised in AD patients and that several AMPs are expressed at significantly higher amounts in AD compared to healthy skin. AD patients have an increased susceptibility to Staphylococcus aureus skin infection suggesting that AMP levels expressed by keratinocytes of AD patients might not be sufficient to combat pathogenic skin infection or that AMP function is disturbed. Increasing AMP expression in AD skin and repairing the skin barrier defect might have a therapeutic effect in AD patients enabling the skin to mount an enhanced response to pathogens.
Study Information
pubmed
2011
2011-05-12T00:00:00.000Z
10.1159/000323296
61
111