Menu
Peptide Database
Results
No peptides found
Featured

Use search to browse all 100+ peptides

LL-37

Cathelicidin, hCAP-18, FALL-39, CAP-18

Quick Stats
Studies 2230
Trials 95
Score 2
2008 pubmed 133 citations

The role of antimicrobial peptides at the ocular surface.

McDermott. Alison M AM

Key Findings

  • LL‑37 is produced by eye cells and added by immune cells during infection
  • LL‑37 and beta‑defensin‑3 have strong independent antimicrobial effects
  • Other antimicrobial peptides may work together with LL‑37 to protect the eye and aid wound healing

Practical Outcomes

  • For now, the main takeaway is that LL‑37 is a promising candidate for future eye‑drop or wound‑healing products, but there’s no proven DIY protocol. Biohackers should watch for clinical trials or commercial formulations before trying to use it for eye health or systemic benefits.

Summary

The eye’s surface makes a natural antimicrobial peptide called LL‑37, which helps kill bacteria, fungi and viruses and may also speed up wound healing. While labs show it works well on its own and together with other peptides, there’s no ready‑to‑use supplement or dosage for everyday people yet.

Abstract

Antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) such as defensins and cathelicidins are small peptides with broad-spectrum activity against bacteria, fungi and viruses. In addition, several AMPs modulate mammalian cell behaviours including migration, proliferation and cytokine production. This review describes findings from recent studies showing the presence of various AMPs at the human ocular surface and discusses their mechanism of antimicrobial action and potential non-microbicidal roles. Corneal and conjunctival epithelial cells produce beta-defensins and the cathelicidin LL-37, whereas neutrophils, infiltrating in response to a specific stimulus, supply additional LL-37 as well as alpha-defensins. In vitro studies suggest that LL-37 and human beta-defensin-3 are the most likely to have significant independent antimicrobial activity, while other AMPs may act synergistically to help protect the ocular surface from invading pathogens. Current evidence also supports a role for some AMPs in modulating wound healing responses. Although yet to be brought to fruition, AMPs hold significant potential as therapeutic agents for the prophylaxis and treatment of infection, promotion of wound healing and immune modulation.

Study Information

Provider

pubmed

Year

2008

Date

2008-12-20T00:00:00.000Z

DOI

10.1159/000187622

Citations

133

References

243