Menu
Peptide Database
Results
No peptides found
Featured

Use search to browse all 100+ peptides

LL-37

Cathelicidin, hCAP-18, FALL-39, CAP-18

Quick Stats
Studies 2230
Trials 95
Score 2
2000 pubmed

Activity of cecropin P1 and FA-LL-37 against urogenital microflora.

Smeianov. V V; Scott. K K; Reid. G G

Key Findings

  • FA‑LL‑37 kills E. coli at 25 µM and stops growth of P. aeruginosa and K. pneumoniae at higher doses
  • Cecropin P1 is bactericidal against E. coli, P. aeruginosa and K. pneumoniae at low micromolar concentrations
  • Both peptides spare most Lactobacillus strains, with only one poultry isolate affected at 100 µM

Practical Outcomes

  • These peptides could be explored as ingredients for a topical UTI treatment, but they are not yet ready for DIY use. More research on formulation, dosing, and safety in humans is needed before biohackers can apply them.

Summary

The study shows two antimicrobial peptides, FA‑LL‑37 and cecropin P1, can kill common urinary‑tract bacteria like E. coli, P. aeruginosa and K. pneumoniae at micromolar levels while mostly leaving beneficial lactobacilli untouched, suggesting they might be useful in a topical cream for UTIs, but the work is still early and no human dosing or safety info is provided.

Abstract

Two mammalian antimicrobial peptides, FA-LL-37 and cecropin P1, were tested for activity against six uropathogens and five Lactobacillus strains by broth microdilution assay. Both peptides inhibited Escherichia coli at 25 microM (FA-LL-39), and 1.56 microM (cecropin P1), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (12.5 microM, and 25 microM), and Klebsiella pneumoniae, (50 microM, and 1.56 microM), but not Enterococcus faecalis and Staphylococcus epidermidis. FA-LL-37 acted bacteriocidally against E. coli and bacteriostatically against the other two Gram-negative organisms. Cecropin P1 was bacteriocidal to all susceptible bacteria. Lactobacilli were resistant to both peptides, with the exception of poultry isolate Lactobacillus fermentum B-54, which was susceptible to FA-LL-37 at 100 microM. The differential activities of these peptides toward Gram-negative uropathogens versus urogenital lactobacilli demonstrate their potential as a topical treatment for urinary tract infections. In addition, production of such peptides in vivo could be a natural mechanism to aid in the maintenance of the lactobacilli-dominated urogenital flora at the expense of pathogens.

Study Information

Provider

pubmed

Year

2000

DOI

10.1016/s1286-4579(00)90359-9