Menu
Peptide Database
Results
No peptides found
Featured

Use search to browse all 100+ peptides

Pinealon

EDR peptide, Glu-Asp-Arg tripeptide

Quick Stats
Studies 19
Trials 1
Score 1
2019 pubmed 5 citations

Role of Mono- and Divalent Ions in Peptide Glu-Asp-Arg-DNA Interaction.

Silanteva. Irina A IA; Komolkin. Andrei V AV; Morozova. Ekaterina A EA; Vorontsov-Velyaminov. Pavel N PN; Kasyanenko. Nina A NA

Key Findings

  • The peptide Glu-Asp-Arg (EDR) can partially penetrate the DNA major groove and interact mainly with the N7 and O6 atoms of guanine.
  • Mg2+ ions boost the DNA‑EDR interaction by effectively screening the negatively charged phosphate backbone.
  • The magnesium‑enhanced binding remains observable even in solutions that contain other salts.

Practical Outcomes

  • For now, the findings are basic science and don’t translate into a clear supplement or protocol. While magnesium appears to influence peptide‑DNA binding, there’s no evidence yet that taking the peptide or extra magnesium will affect longevity, metabolism, or performance. More applied research would be needed before any actionable advice can be given.

Summary

Scientists showed that the tiny peptide Glu-Asp-Arg can slip into the DNA’s major groove and touch specific parts of guanine, and that magnesium ions make this binding easier by shielding DNA’s negative charge. The work is purely mechanistic and doesn’t tell us how to use the peptide for health.

Abstract

The interaction of the regulatory biologically active peptide Glu-Asp-Arg (EDR) with DNA is considered by spectral, NMR, viscosimetry, and molecular dynamics methods. It was shown that EDR can partly penetrate into the major groove of DNA and affect the base atoms, mainly the N7 and O6 of guanine. It was observed that Mg<sup>2+</sup> ions can promote DNA-EDR interaction due to their effective screening of the negatively charged phosphate groups of DNA. This action of Mg<sup>2+</sup> remains in salted solution as well.

Study Information

Provider

pubmed

Year

2019

Date

2019-02-22T00:00:00.000Z

DOI

10.1021/acs.jpcb.8b10359

Citations

5

References

27